On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:43 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:50 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Introduce flags field in xdp_frame/xdp_buffer data structure > > > to define additional buffer features. At the moment the only > > > supported buffer feature is multi-buffer bit (mb). Multi-buffer bit > > > is used to specify if this is a linear buffer (mb = 0) or a multi-buffer > > > frame (mb = 1). In the latter case the shared_info area at the end of > > > the first buffer will be properly initialized to link together > > > subsequent buffers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Instead of passing this between buffers and frames I wonder if this > > wouldn't be better to place in something like the xdp_mem_info > > structure since this is something that would be specific to how the > > device is handling memory anyway. You could probably split the type > > field into a 16b type and a 16b flags field. Then add your bit where 0 > > is linear/legacy and 1 is scatter-gather/multi-buffer. > > > > ack, this should be fine but I put the flag field in xdp_buff/xdp_frame > in order to reuse it for some xdp hw-hints (e.g rx checksum type). > We can put it in xdp_mem_info too but I guess it would be less intuitive, what > do you think? I think it makes the most sense in xdp_mem_info. It already tells us what to expect in some respect in regards to memory layout as it tells us if we are dealing with shared pages or whole pages and how to recycle them. I would think that applies almost identically to scatter-gather XDP the same way. As far as the addition of flags there is still time for that later as we still have the 32b of unused space after frame_sz.
