On 6/17/21 2:09 AM, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@xxxxxxxxxx> This is to more closely match behaviour of bpf_skb_change_proto() which now does not adjust gso_size, and thus thoretically supports all gso types, and does not need to set SKB_GSO_DODGY nor reset gso_segs to zero. Something similar should probably be done with bpf_skb_net_grow(), but that code scares me.
Took in all except this one, would be good to have a complete solution for both bpf_skb_net_{shrink,grow}(). If you don't have the cycles, I'll look into it. Thanks, Daniel