On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:42 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/21/21 8:20 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > The SO_REUSEPORT option allows sockets to listen on the same port and to > > accept connections evenly. However, there is a defect in the current > > implementation [1]. When a SYN packet is received, the connection is tied > > to a listening socket. Accordingly, when the listener is closed, in-flight > > requests during the three-way handshake and child sockets in the accept > > queue are dropped even if other listeners on the same port could accept > > such connections. > > > > This situation can happen when various server management tools restart > > server (such as nginx) processes. For instance, when we change nginx > > configurations and restart it, it spins up new workers that respect the new > > configuration and closes all listeners on the old workers, resulting in the > > in-flight ACK of 3WHS is responded by RST. > > > > To avoid such a situation, users have to know deeply how the kernel handles > > SYN packets and implement connection draining by eBPF [2]: > > > > 1. Stop routing SYN packets to the listener by eBPF. > > 2. Wait for all timers to expire to complete requests > > 3. Accept connections until EAGAIN, then close the listener. > > > > or > > > > 1. Start counting SYN packets and accept syscalls using the eBPF map. > > 2. Stop routing SYN packets. > > 3. Accept connections up to the count, then close the listener. > > > > In either way, we cannot close a listener immediately. However, ideally, > > the application need not drain the not yet accepted sockets because 3WHS > > and tying a connection to a listener are just the kernel behaviour. The > > root cause is within the kernel, so the issue should be addressed in kernel > > space and should not be visible to user space. This patchset fixes it so > > that users need not take care of kernel implementation and connection > > draining. With this patchset, the kernel redistributes requests and > > connections from a listener to the others in the same reuseport group > > at/after close or shutdown syscalls. > > > > Although some software does connection draining, there are still merits in > > migration. For some security reasons, such as replacing TLS certificates, > > we may want to apply new settings as soon as possible and/or we may not be > > able to wait for connection draining. The sockets in the accept queue have > > not started application sessions yet. So, if we do not drain such sockets, > > they can be handled by the newer listeners and could have a longer > > lifetime. It is difficult to drain all connections in every case, but we > > can decrease such aborted connections by migration. In that sense, > > migration is always better than draining. > > > > Moreover, auto-migration simplifies user space logic and also works well in > > a case where we cannot modify and build a server program to implement the > > workaround. > > > > Note that the source and destination listeners MUST have the same settings > > at the socket API level; otherwise, applications may face inconsistency and > > cause errors. In such a case, we have to use the eBPF program to select a > > specific listener or to cancel migration. > > > > Special thanks to Martin KaFai Lau for bouncing ideas and exchanging code > > snippets along the way. > > > > > > Link: > > [1] The SO_REUSEPORT socket option > > https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ > > > > [2] Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Add SO_REUSEPORT_LISTEN_OFF socket option as drain mode > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1458828813.10868.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > This series needs review/ACKs from TCP maintainers. Eric/Neal/Yuchung please take > a look again. Eric, I've looked through bpf and tcp changes and they don't look scary at all. I think the feature is useful and a bit of extra complexity is worth it. So please review tcp bits to make sure we didn't miss anything. Thanks!
