Re: [PATCH 1/1] bpf: avoid unnecessary IPI in bpf_flush_icache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/1/21 5:06 PM, Yanfei Xu wrote:
It's no need to trigger IPI for keeping pipeline fresh in bpf case.

This needs a more concrete explanation/analysis on "why it is safe" to do so
rather than just saying that it is not needed.

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index f7b194878a99..5311f8be4ba4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int validate_code(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
  {
-	flush_icache_range((unsigned long)start, (unsigned long)end);
+	__flush_icache_range((unsigned long)start, (unsigned long)end);
  }
struct arm64_jit_data {





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux