On Tue, 25 May 2021 16:20:27 +0200 Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Saeed Mahameed <saeed@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 15:31 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: [...] > > > I agree we need full visibility and transparency, i actually recommend: > > > bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > +1, please keep this on the list :) > > Sure, let's keep it the classic way. > I removed the netdev ML from the CCs and added bpf there. I'm very happy with the momentum, that multiple people and companies are interested in this XDP-hints subject. I doubt everyone is subscribed to bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and I'm having a hard time remembering who to Cc. I see this as a working group effort. Is anybody against that we create xdp-hints@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (and I/toke will add people to this list). This is only to reduce the Cc list, and we should still keep bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in Cc as well as our upstream discussion list. If nobody object then we will do this in a couple of days... (Do let me know offlist, if you want to be removed from this Cc list prior to creating this... else CC list, you are opting in :-P ). -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
