On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:13:26PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > > +BPF_CALL_3(io_bpf_queue_sqe, struct io_bpf_ctx *, bpf_ctx, > + const struct io_uring_sqe *, sqe, > + u32, sqe_len) > +{ > + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = bpf_ctx->ctx; > + struct io_kiocb *req; > + > + if (sqe_len != sizeof(struct io_uring_sqe)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + req = io_alloc_req(ctx); that is GFP_KERNEL allocation. It's only allowed from sleepable bpf progs and further down there is a correct check for it, so all good. But submitting sqe is a fundemntal io_uring operation, so what is the use case for non-sleepable? In other words why bother? Allow sleepable only and simplify the code? > + if (unlikely(!req)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + if (!percpu_ref_tryget_many(&ctx->refs, 1)) { > + kmem_cache_free(req_cachep, req); > + return -EAGAIN; > + } > + percpu_counter_add(¤t->io_uring->inflight, 1); > + refcount_add(1, ¤t->usage); > + > + /* returns number of submitted SQEs or an error */ > + return !io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, sqe); A buggy bpf prog will be able to pass junk sizeof(struct io_uring_sqe) as 'sqe' here. What kind of validation io_submit_sqe() does to avoid crashing the kernel? General comments that apply to all patches: - commit logs are way too terse. Pls expand with details. - describe new bpf helpers in comments in bpf.h. Just adding them to an enum is not enough. - selftest/bpf are mandatory for all new bpf features. - consider bpf_link style of attaching bpf progs. We had enough issues with progs that get stuck due to application bugs. Auto-detach saves the day more often than not.