On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:29 AM Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The cppcheck static code analysis reported the following error:
> >> helpers.c:713:43: warning: Uninitialized variable: bufs [uninitvar]
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > ARRAY_SIZE(bufs->tmp_bufs))) {
> ^
>
> ARRAY_SIZE is a macro that expands to sizeofs, so bufs is not actually
> dereferenced at runtime, and the code is actually safe. But to keep
> things tidy, this patch removes the need for a call to ARRAY_SIZE by
> extracting the size of the array into a macro. Cppcheck should no longer
> be confused and the code ends up being a bit cleaner.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 3a5ab614cbb0..73443498d88f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -698,8 +698,9 @@ static int bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
> #define MAX_BPRINTF_BUF_LEN 512
>
> /* Support executing three nested bprintf helper calls on a given CPU */
> +#define MAX_BPRINTF_NEST_LEVEL 3
> struct bpf_bprintf_buffers {
> - char tmp_bufs[3][MAX_BPRINTF_BUF_LEN];
> + char tmp_bufs[MAX_BPRINTF_NEST_LEVEL][MAX_BPRINTF_BUF_LEN];
> };
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_bprintf_buffers, bpf_bprintf_bufs);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
> @@ -711,7 +712,7 @@ static int try_get_fmt_tmp_buf(char **tmp_buf)
>
> preempt_disable();
> nest_level = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > ARRAY_SIZE(bufs->tmp_bufs))) {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > MAX_BPRINTF_NEST_LEVEL)) {
> this_cpu_dec(bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
> preempt_enable();
> return -EBUSY;
> --
> 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
>
