Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
From: Florent Revest <revest@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:09:32 +0200
Cc: bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx, clang-built-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, syzbot+63122d0bc347f18c1884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <202105110911.f084GH7J-lkp@intel.com>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 3:58 AM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    kernel/bpf/helpers.c:718:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bpf_bprintf_buf'; did you mean 'bpf_bprintf_bufs'?

Ugh, reminder to self: don't zealously rename variables just before
sending a patch out.

I'm sending a v2, sorry for the noise.

References:
- [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
  - From: Florent Revest
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
  - From: kernel test robot

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next seccomp 10/12] seccomp-ebpf: Add ability to read user memory
Next by Date: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux