Re: Typical way to handle missing macros in vmlinux.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 5:15 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:53 PM Grant Seltzer Richman
> <grantseltzer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm working on enabling CO:RE in a project I work on, tracee, and am
> > running into the dilemma of missing macros that we previously were
> > able to import from their various header files. I understand that
> > macros don't make their way into BTF and therefore the generated
> > vmlinux.h won't have them. However I can't import the various header
> > files because of multiple-definition issues.
>
> Sadly, copy/pasting has been the only way so far.
>
> >
> > Do people typically redefine each of these macros for their project?
> > If so is there anything I should be careful of, such as architectural
> > differences. Does anyone have creative ideas, even if not developed
> > fully yet that I can possibly contribute to libbpf?
>
> We've discussed adding Clang built-in to detect if a specific type is
> already defined and doing something like this in vmlinux.h:
>
> #if !__builtin_is_type_defined(struct task_struct)
> struct task_struct {
>      ...
> }
> #endif
>
> And just do that for every struct, union, typedef. That would allow
> vmlinux.h to co-exist (somewhat) with other types.
>
> Another alternative is to not use vmlinux.h and use just linux
> headers, but mark necessary types with
> __attribute__((preserve_access_index)) to make them CO-RE relocatable.
> You can add that to existing types with the same pragma that vmlinux.h
> uses.

I'm attempting to try doing the above. I'm just replacing
bpf_probe_read with bpf_core_read and not importing vmlinux.h, just
all the kernel headers I need.

When you say "Add that to existing types with the same pragma that
vmlinux.h uses", Should I be able to add the following to my bpf
source file before importing my headers?

ifndef BPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX
#pragma clang attribute push (__attribute__((preserve_access_index)),
apply_to = record)
#endif

and then pop the attribute at the bottom of the file, or after the
header includes.

I've tried this and get a whole bunch of 'unknown attribute' warnings,
leading me to believe that I either have something installed
incorrectly or don't understand how to use clang attributes. Do I need
to edit the types in the actual header files?

Thank you very very much for the help!
- Grant
>
> >
> > Thanks so much,
> > Grant Seltzer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux