CO-RE: Weird immediate for bpf_core_field_exists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrii and Yonghong,

This is probably a case of me holding it wrong, but I figured I would
share this nonetheless. Given the following C:

struct s {
    int _1;
    char _2;
};

typedef struct s s_t;

union u {
    int *_1;
    char *_2;
};

__section("socket_filter/fields") int fields() {
    struct t {
        union {
            s_t s[10];
        };
        struct {
            union u u;
        };
    } bar;
    return bpf_core_field_exists((&bar)[1]);
}

clang-12 generates the following instructions:

0000000000000000 <fields>:
;     return bpf_core_field_exists((&bar)[1]);
       0:    b7 00 00 00 58 00 00 00    r0 = 88
       1:    95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    exit

The weird bit is that the immediate for instruction 0 isn't 1 but 88.
Coincidentally sizeof(bar) is also 88 bytes.

$ clang-12 --version
Ubuntu clang version
12.0.0-++20210126113614+510b3d4b3e02-1~exp1~20210126104320.178

I've tried clang-13 as well, same result.

Best,
Lorenz

-- 
Lorenz Bauer  |  Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK

www.cloudflare.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux