Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/5] CO-RE relocation selftests fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:30 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lorenz Bauer noticed that core_reloc selftest has two inverted CHECK()
> conditions, allowing failing tests to pass unnoticed. Fixing that opened up
> few long-standing (field existence and direct memory bitfields) and one recent
> failures (BTF_KIND_FLOAT relos).
>
> This patch set fixes core_reloc selftest to capture such failures reliably in
> the future. It also fixes all the newly failing tests. See individual patches
> for details.
>
> This patch set also completes a set of ASSERT_xxx() macros, so now there
> should be a very little reason to use verbose and error-prone generic CHECK()
> macro.
>
> v1->v2:
>   - updated bpf_core_fields_are_compat() comment to mention FLOAT (Lorenz).

Applied.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux