Hi, Andrii! On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:52 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:45 AM Yauheni Kaliuta > <yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Set bpf table sizes dynamically according to the runtime page size > > value. > > > > Do not switch to ASSERT macros, keep CHECK, for consistency with the > > rest of the test. Can be a separate cleanup patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++--- > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c > > index d37161e59bb2..159de99621c7 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c > > @@ -41,13 +41,30 @@ static int process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len) > > void test_ringbuf_multi(void) > > { > > struct test_ringbuf_multi *skel; > > - struct ring_buffer *ringbuf; > > + struct ring_buffer *ringbuf = NULL; > > int err; > > + int page_size = getpagesize(); > > > > - skel = test_ringbuf_multi__open_and_load(); > > - if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_load", "skeleton open&load failed\n")) > > + skel = test_ringbuf_multi__open(); > > + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "skeleton open failed\n")) > > return; > > > > + err = bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.ringbuf1, page_size); > > + if (CHECK(err != 0, "bpf_map__set_max_entries", "bpf_map__set_max_entries failed\n")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + err = bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.ringbuf2, page_size); > > + if (CHECK(err != 0, "bpf_map__set_max_entries", "bpf_map__set_max_entries failed\n")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + err = bpf_map__set_max_entries(bpf_map__inner_map(skel->maps.ringbuf_arr), page_size); > > + if (CHECK(err != 0, "bpf_map__set_max_entries", "bpf_map__set_max_entries failed\n")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + err = test_ringbuf_multi__load(skel); > > + if (CHECK(err != 0, "skel_load", "skeleton load failed\n")) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > To test bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd() interaction with map-in-map > initialization, can you extend the test to have another map-in-map > (could be HASHMAP, just for fun), which is initialized with either > ringbuf1 or ringbuf2, but then from user-space use a different way to > override inner map definition: > > int proto_fd = bpf_create_map(... RINGBUF of page_size ...); > bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd(skel->maps.ringbuf_hash, proto_fd); > close(proto_fd); > > /* perform load, it should succeed */ > > Important is to use a different map-in-map from ringbuf_arr, so that > load fails, unless set_inner_map_fd() properly updates internals of a > map. Is that what you mean? https://github.com/ykaliuta/linux/commit/59fedd3b00678023d04b74bac61581a04896602e diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c index 159de99621c7..5794317d05dd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ void test_ringbuf_multi(void) struct ring_buffer *ringbuf = NULL; int err; int page_size = getpagesize(); + int proto_fd; skel = test_ringbuf_multi__open(); if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "skeleton open failed\n")) @@ -61,6 +62,16 @@ void test_ringbuf_multi(void) if (CHECK(err != 0, "bpf_map__set_max_entries", "bpf_map__set_max_entries failed\n")) goto cleanup; + proto_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF, 0, 0, page_size, 0); + if (CHECK(proto_fd == -1, "bpf_create_map", "bpf_create_map failed\n")) + goto cleanup; + + err = bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd(skel->maps.ringbuf_hash, proto_fd); + if (CHECK(err != 0, "bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd", "bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd failed\n")) + goto cleanup; + + close(proto_fd); + err = test_ringbuf_multi__load(skel); if (CHECK(err != 0, "skel_load", "skeleton load failed\n")) goto cleanup; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c index 055c10b2ff80..197b86546dca 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c @@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ struct { }, }; +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __type(key, int); + __array(values, struct ringbuf_map); +} ringbuf_hash SEC(".maps") = { + .values = { + [0] = &ringbuf1, + }, +}; + I get with it: test_ringbuf_multi:PASS:bpf_map__set_inner_map_fd 0 nsec libbpf: Error in bpf_create_map_xattr(ringbuf_arr):Invalid argument(-22). Retrying without BTF. libbpf: Error in bpf_create_map_xattr(ringbuf_hash):Invalid argument(-22). Retrying without BTF. libbpf: map 'ringbuf_hash': failed to create: Invalid argument(-22) libbpf: failed to load object 'test_ringbuf_multi' libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_ringbuf_multi': -22 test_ringbuf_multi:FAIL:skel_load skeleton load failed #90 ringbuf_multi:FAIL > > > /* only trigger BPF program for current process */ > > skel->bss->pid = getpid(); > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c > > index edf3b6953533..055c10b2ff80 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ struct sample { > > > > struct ringbuf_map { > > __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF); > > - __uint(max_entries, 1 << 12); > > } ringbuf1 SEC(".maps"), > > ringbuf2 SEC(".maps"); > > > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > -- WBR, Yauheni