Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify the kfunc call is not ABI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify the kfunc call is not ABI
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:40:31 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@xxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210330054150.2933542-1-kafai@fb.com>
Thread-index: AQHXJSds/Y13nqbcI0mxWNoTsSG/jaqcFNmA
Thread-topic: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify the kfunc call is not ABI


> On Mar 29, 2021, at 10:41 PM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This patch updates bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify that the kernel
> function callable by bpf program is not an ABI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Update doc about calling kernel function
  - From: Martin KaFai Lau
- [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify the kfunc call is not ABI
  - From: Martin KaFai Lau

Prev by Date: Re: [Patch bpf-next v7 09/13] udp: implement ->read_sock() for sockmap
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: Update clang requirement in README.rst for testing kfunc call
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Update bpf_design_QA.rst to clarify the kfunc call is not ABI
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: Update clang requirement in README.rst for testing kfunc call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]