Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg, > it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock > to protect this list like protecting other skb queues. > > __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking, > it still has to use lock_sock. > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
