Re: [PATCH -tip v4 10/12] x86/kprobes: Push a fake return address at kretprobe_trampoline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 03:05:03 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:40:58 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:30:07 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:41:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > >  	".global kretprobe_trampoline\n"
> > > >  	".type kretprobe_trampoline, @function\n"
> > > >  	"kretprobe_trampoline:\n"
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > 
> > > So what happens if we get an NMI here? That is, after the RET but before
> > > the push? Then our IP points into the trampoline but we've not done that
> > > push yet.
> > 
> > Not only NMI, but also interrupts can happen. There is no cli/sti here.
> > 
> > Anyway, thanks for pointing!
> > I think in UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_REGS and UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_REGS_PARTIAL cases
> > ORC unwinder also has to check the state->ip and if it is kretprobe_trampoline,
> > it should be recovered.
> > What about this?
> 
> Hmm, this seems to intoduce another issue on stacktrace from kprobes.
> 
>            <...>-137     [003] d.Z.    17.250714: p_full_proxy_read_5: (full_proxy_read+0x5/0x80)
>            <...>-137     [003] d.Z.    17.250737: <stack trace>
>  => kprobe_trace_func+0x1d0/0x2c0
>  => kprobe_dispatcher+0x39/0x60
>  => aggr_pre_handler+0x4f/0x90
>  => kprobe_int3_handler+0x152/0x1a0
>  => exc_int3+0x47/0x140
>  => asm_exc_int3+0x31/0x40
>  => 0
>  => 0
>  => 0
>  => 0
>  => 0
>  => 0
>  => 0
> 
> Let me check...

I confirmed this is not related to this series, but occurs when I build kernels with different
configs without cleanup.

Once I build kernel with CONFIG_UNWIND_GUESS=y (for testing), and after that,
I build kernel again with CONFIG_UNWIND_ORC=y (but without make clean), this
happened. In this case, I guess ORC data might be corrupted?
When I cleanup and rebuild, the stacktrace seems correct.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux