On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c > index 47b7c5334c34..ecb5634b4c4a 100644 > --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c > +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c > @@ -754,6 +754,12 @@ static void tls_update(struct sock *sk, struct proto *p, > > ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk); > if (likely(ctx)) { > + /* TLS does not have an unhash proto in SW cases, but we need > + * to ensure we stop using the sock_map unhash routine because > + * the associated psock is being removed. So use the original > + * unhash handler. > + */ > + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot->unhash, p->unhash); > ctx->sk_write_space = write_space; > ctx->sk_proto = p; It looks awkward to update sk->sk_proto inside tls_update(), at least when ctx!=NULL. What is wrong with updating it in sk_psock_restore_proto() when inet_csk_has_ulp() is true? It looks better to me. diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h index 6c09d94be2e9..da5dc3ef0ee3 100644 --- a/include/linux/skmsg.h +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h @@ -360,8 +360,8 @@ static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk, static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock) { - sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash; if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) { + sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->sk_proto->unhash; tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, psock->saved_write_space); } else { sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space; sk_psock_restore_proto() is the only caller of tcp_update_ulp() so should be equivalent. Thanks.