Re: [Patch bpf-next v6 02/12] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg

[Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:25 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/23 8:37, Cong Wang wrote:
> > +static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_next_msg(struct sk_psock *psock,
> > +                                            struct sk_msg *msg)
> > +{
> > +     struct sk_msg *ret;
>
> Nit:
> Use msg instead of ret to be consistently with sk_psock_dequeue_msg()
> and sk_psock_next_msg().

Please read it carefully, clearly 'msg' is already a parameter name here.

Thanks.