Re: [PATCH] bpf: avoid old-style declaration warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:52 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> gcc -Wextra wants type modifiers in the normal order:
>
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:70:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
>    70 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
>       | ^~~~~
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c:91:1: error: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
>    91 | const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
>       | ^~~~~
>
> Fixes: 3f6719c7b62f ("bpf: Add bpf_bprm_opts_set helper")
> Fixes: 27672f0d280a ("bpf: Add a BPF helper for getting the IMA hash of an inode")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks for fixing!

Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux