Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Make symbol 'bpf_task_storage_busy' static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Mar 11, 2021, at 5:15 AM, 'Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The sparse tool complains as follows:
> 
> kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c:23:1: warning:
> symbol '__pcpu_scope_bpf_task_storage_busy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> This symbol is not used outside of bpf_task_storage.c, so this
> commit marks it static.
> 
> Fixes: bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

Thanks for the fix!

> ---
> kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
> index fd3c74ef608e..3ce75758d394 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> 
> DEFINE_BPF_STORAGE_CACHE(task_cache);
> 
> -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_task_storage_busy);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_task_storage_busy);
> 
> static void bpf_task_storage_lock(void)
> {
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux