RE: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 7/9] selftest/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_FLOAT tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Test the good variants as well as the potential malformed ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/btf_helpers.c    |   4 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h       |   3 +
>  3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
> 

Should we also add a test in reloc_size.c to verify bpf_core_field_size()
is working correctly with floats. Seems like a useful test to me.

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_size.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_size.c
index d7fb6cfc7891..c75d135009ab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_size.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_size.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct core_reloc_size {
        int arr_field[4];
        void *ptr_field;
        enum { VALUE = 123 } enum_field;
+       float floating;
 };
 
 SEC("raw_tracepoint/sys_enter")
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ int test_core_size(void *ctx)
        out->arr_elem_sz = bpf_core_field_size(in->arr_field[0]);
        out->ptr_sz = bpf_core_field_size(in->ptr_field);
        out->enum_sz = bpf_core_field_size(in->enum_field);
+       out->floating_sz = bpf_core_field_size(in->floating);
 
        return 0;
 }



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux