I submitted a new patch that includes CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES. I
renamed the patch to include this change so it's showing up as a new
thread, I also fixed the time issue, apologies for the confusion!
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:22 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 7:34 AM grantseltzer <grantseltzer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This adds the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF kernel compile option to output of
> > the bpftool feature command. This is relevant for developers that want
> > to use libbpf to account for data structure definition differences
> > between kernels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: grantseltzer <grantseltzer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by should have a properly capitalized (where it makes
> sense) real name of the author. Is it Grant Seltzer then?
>
> > ---
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> > index 359960a8f..b90cc6832 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(const char *define_prefix)
> > { "CONFIG_BPF_JIT", },
> > /* Avoid compiling eBPF interpreter (use JIT only) */
> > { "CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON", },
> > + /* Kernel BTF debug information available */
> > + { "CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF", },
>
> How about checking CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES as well (i.e.,
> "Kernel module BTF information is available")?
>
> >
> > /* cgroups */
> > { "CONFIG_CGROUPS", },
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
