On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:33:37PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > xsk_lookup_bpf_maps, based on prog_fd, looks whether current prog has a
> > reference to XSKMAP. BPF prog can include insns that work on various BPF
> > maps and this is covered by iterating through map_ids.
> >
> > The bpf_map_info that is passed to bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for filling
> > needs to be cleared at each iteration, so that it doesn't any outdated
> > fields and that is currently missing in the function of interest.
> >
> > To fix that, zero-init map_info via memset before each
> > bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd call.
> >
> > Also, since the area of this code is touched, in general strcmp is
> > considered harmful, so let's convert it to strncmp and provide the
> > length of the array name that we're looking for.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> This is a bugfix independent of the link bits correct? Would be best
> to send to bpf then.
Right, I can pull this out of the series.
>
> > tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > index 5911868efa43..fb259c0bba93 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> > __u32 i, *map_ids, num_maps, prog_len = sizeof(struct bpf_prog_info);
> > __u32 map_len = sizeof(struct bpf_map_info);
> > struct bpf_prog_info prog_info = {};
> > + const char *map_name = "xsks_map";
> > struct xsk_ctx *ctx = xsk->ctx;
> > struct bpf_map_info map_info;
> > int fd, err;
> > @@ -645,13 +646,14 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> > if (fd < 0)
> > continue;
> >
> > + memset(&map_info, 0, map_len);
> > err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &map_info, &map_len);
> > if (err) {
> > close(fd);
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!strcmp(map_info.name, "xsks_map")) {
> > + if (!strncmp(map_info.name, map_name, strlen(map_name))) {
> > ctx->xsks_map_fd = fd;
> > continue;
>
> Also just looking at this how is above not buggy? Should be a break instead
> of continue? If we match another "xsks_map" here won't we stomp on xsks_map_fd
> and leak a file descriptor?
Will fix!
>
> > }
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
>
>
