Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftest/bpf: add test for var-offset stack access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



done in v3. Thanks!

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:37 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:54 AM Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add a higher-level test (C BPF program) for the new functionality -
> > variable access stack reads and writes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_var_off.c  | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_stack_var_off.c  | 43 ++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_var_off.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stack_var_off.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_var_off.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c4c47fb0f0af
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stack_var_off.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > +#include "test_stack_var_off.skel.h"
> > +
> > +int dummy;
> > +
> > +noinline void uprobed_function(char *s, int len)
> > +{
> > +       /* Do something to keep the compiler from removing the function.
> > +        */
> > +       dummy++;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_stack_var_off(void)
> > +{
> > +       int duration = 0;
> > +       struct bpf_link *uprobe_link;
> > +       struct test_stack_var_off *skel;
> > +       size_t uprobe_offset;
> > +       ssize_t base_addr;
> > +       char s[100];
> > +
> > +       base_addr = get_base_addr();
> > +       if (CHECK(base_addr < 0, "get_base_addr",
> > +                 "failed to find base addr: %zd", base_addr))
> > +               return;
> > +       uprobe_offset = (size_t)&uprobed_function - base_addr;
> > +
> > +       skel = test_stack_var_off__open_and_load();
> > +       if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open skeleton\n"))
> > +               return;
> > +       if (CHECK(!skel->bss, "check_bss", ".bss wasn't mmap()-ed\n"))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +       uprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe(skel->progs.uprobe,
> > +                                                false /* retprobe */,
> > +                                                0 /* self pid */,
> > +                                                "/proc/self/exe",
> > +                                                uprobe_offset);
> > +       if (CHECK(IS_ERR(uprobe_link), "attach_uprobe",
> > +                 "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(uprobe_link)))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +       skel->links.uprobe = uprobe_link;
> > +
> > +       /* trigger uprobe */
> > +       s[0] = 1;
> > +       s[1] = 10;
> > +       uprobed_function(&s[0], 2);
>
> I don't think uprobe() is essential to this test and just obscured
> what is being tested. I'd just use a global variable to pass whatever
> input data you need and use usleep(1), just like lots of other tests.
>
> > +
> > +       if (CHECK(skel->bss->uprobe_res != 10, "check_uprobe_res",
> > +                 "wrong uprobe res: %d\n", skel->bss->uprobe_res))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > +       test_stack_var_off__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stack_var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stack_var_off.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..44f982684541
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stack_var_off.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +// Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook
> > +
> > +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +
> > +int uprobe_res;
> > +
> > +SEC("uprobe/func")
> > +int BPF_KPROBE(uprobe, char *s, int len)
> > +{
> > +       /* This BPF program performs variable-offset reads and writes on a
> > +        * stack-allocated buffer.
> > +        */
> > +       char buf[16];
> > +       unsigned long idx;
> > +       char out;
> > +
> > +       /* Zero-out the buffer so we can read anywhere inside it. */
> > +       __builtin_memset(&buf, 0, 16);
> > +       /* Copy the contents of s from user-space. */
> > +       len &= 0xf;
> > +       if (bpf_probe_read_user(&buf, len, s)) {
> > +               bpf_printk("error reading user mem\n");
> > +               return 1;
> > +       }
> > +       /* Index into the buffer at an unknown offset that comes from the
> > +        * buffer itself. This is a variable-offset stack read.
> > +        */
> > +       idx = buf[0];
> > +       idx &= 0xf;
> > +       out = buf[idx];
> > +       /* Append something to the buffer. The position where we append it
> > +        * is unknown. This is a variable-offset stack write.
> > +        */
> > +       buf[len] = buf[idx];
> > +       uprobe_res = out;
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux