Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: stop using feature-detection Makefiles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/3/21 12:34 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Libbpf's Makefile relies on Linux tools infrastructure's feature detection
> framework, but libbpf's needs are very modest: it detects the presence of
> libelf and libz, both of which are mandatory. So it doesn't benefit much from
> the framework, but pays significant costs in terms of maintainability and
> debugging experience, when something goes wrong. The other feature detector,
> testing for the presernce of minimal BPF API in system headers is long
> obsolete as well, providing no value.
> 
> So stop using feature detection and just assume the presence of libelf and
> libz during build time. Worst case, user will get a clear and actionable
> linker error, e.g.:
> 
>   /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lelf
> 
> On the other hand, we completely bypass recurring issues various users
> reported over time with false negatives of feature detection (libelf or libz
> not being detected, while they are actually present in the system).
> 
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore |  1 -
>  tools/lib/bpf/Makefile   | 47 ++++------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

Hi Andrii,

This does indeed fix the build problems that I was seeing,
so I can add:
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

but in the long term I think that features/libs/etc. that are
used should be checked for instead of being used blindly... IMO.

Thanks.

-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux