On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:13:07PM +0800, wanghongzhe wrote: > Secondly, the smp_rmb() should be put between reading SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP and reading > seccomp.mode, not between reading seccomp.mode and seccomp->filter, to make > sure that any changes to mode from another thread have been seen after > SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP was seen, as the original comment shown. This issue seems to be > misintroduced at 13aa72f0fd0a9f98a41cefb662487269e2f1ad65 which aims to > refactor the filter callback and the API. So the intuitive solution is to put > it back like: > > Thirdly, however, we can go further to improve the performace of checking > syscall, considering that smp_rmb is always executed on the syscall-check > path at each time for both FILTER and STRICT check while the TSYNC case > which may lead to race condition is just a rare situation, and that in > some arch like Arm64 smp_rmb is dsb(ishld) not a cheap barrier() in x86-64. > > As a result, smp_rmb() should only be executed when necessary, e.g, it is > only necessary when current thread's mode is SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED at the > first TYSNCed time, because after that the current thread's mode will always > be SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER (and SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP will always be set) and can not be > changed anymore by anyone. In other words, after that, any thread can not > change the mode (and SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP), so the race condition disappeared, and > no more smb_rmb() needed ever. > > So the solution is to read mode again behind smp_rmb() after the mode is seen > as SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED by current thread at the first TSYNCed time, and if > the new mode don't equals to SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, do BUG(), go to FILTER path > otherwise. > > RFC -> v1: > - replace rmb() with smp_rmb() > - move the smp_rmb() logic to the middle between SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP and mode > > Signed-off-by: wanghongzhe <wanghongzhe@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/seccomp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c > index 952dc1c90229..a621fb913ec6 100644 > --- a/kernel/seccomp.c > +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c > @@ -1160,12 +1160,6 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd, > int data; > struct seccomp_data sd_local; > > - /* > - * Make sure that any changes to mode from another thread have > - * been seen after SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP was seen. > - */ > - rmb(); > - > if (!sd) { > populate_seccomp_data(&sd_local); > sd = &sd_local; > @@ -1289,7 +1283,6 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd, > > int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) > { > - int mode = current->seccomp.mode; > int this_syscall; > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) && > @@ -1299,10 +1292,26 @@ int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd) > this_syscall = sd ? sd->nr : > syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs()); > > - switch (mode) { > + /* > + * Make sure that any changes to mode from another thread have > + * been seen after SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP was seen. > + */ > + smp_rmb(); Let's start with a patch that just replaces rmb() with smp_rmb() and then work on optimizing. Can you provide performance numbers that show rmb() (and soon smp_rmb()) is causing actual problems here? > + > + switch (current->seccomp.mode) { > case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT: > __secure_computing_strict(this_syscall); /* may call do_exit */ > return 0; > + /* > + * Make sure that change to mode (from SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED to > + * SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER) from another thread using TSYNC ability > + * have been seen after SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP was seen. Read mode again behind > + * smp_rmb(), if it equals SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, go to the right path. > + */ > + case SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED: > + smp_rmb(); > + if (unlikely(current->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER)) > + BUG(); BUG() should never be used[1]. This is a recoverable situation, I think, and should be handled as such. -Kees [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#bug-and-bug-on > case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER: > return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, sd, false); > default: > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Kees Cook