There are 3 tests added into verifier's jit tests to trigger x64
jit jump padding.
The first test can be represented as the following assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+128
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+128
...
129: if r0 == 128 goto pc+128
130: goto pc+128
131: goto pc+127
...
256: goto pc+2
257: goto pc+1
258: r0 = 1
259: ret
We first store a random number to r0 and add the corresponding
conditional jumps (2~129) to make verifier believe that those jump
instructions from 130 to 257 are reachable. When the program is sent to
x64 jit, it starts to optimize out the NOP jumps backwards from 257.
Since there are 128 such jumps, the program easily reaches 15 passes and
triggers jump padding.
Here is the x64 jit code of the first test:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 4c 90 75 e3 call 0xffffffffe375905c
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 fe 04 00 00 je 0x518
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 f9 04 00 00 je 0x51d
...
f6: 48 83 f8 18 cmp rax,0x18
fa: 0f 84 8b 04 00 00 je 0x58b
100: 48 83 f8 19 cmp rax,0x19
104: 0f 84 86 04 00 00 je 0x590
10a: 48 83 f8 1a cmp rax,0x1a
10e: 0f 84 81 04 00 00 je 0x595
...
500: 0f 84 83 01 00 00 je 0x689
506: 48 81 f8 80 00 00 00 cmp rax,0x80
50d: 0f 84 76 01 00 00 je 0x689
513: e9 71 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
518: e9 6c 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
...
5fe: e9 86 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
603: e9 81 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
608: 0f 1f 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax]
60b: eb 7c jmp 0x689
60d: eb 7a jmp 0x689
...
683: eb 04 jmp 0x689
685: eb 02 jmp 0x689
687: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
689: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
68e: c9 leave
68f: c3 ret
As expected, a 3 bytes NOPs is inserted at 608 due to the transition
from imm32 jmp to imm8 jmp. A 2 bytes NOPs is also inserted at 687 to
replace a NOP jump.
The second test case is tricky. Here is the assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+2048
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+2048
...
2049: if r0 == 2048 goto pc+2048
2050: goto pc+2048
2051: goto pc+16
2052: goto pc+15
...
2064: goto pc+3
2065: goto pc+2
2066: goto pc+1
...
[repeat "goto pc+16".."goto pc+1" 127 times]
...
4099: r0 = 2
4100: ret
There are 4 major parts of the program.
1) 1~2049: Those are instructions to make 2050~4098 reachable. Some of
them also could generate the padding for jmp_cond.
2) 2050: This is the target instruction for the imm32 nop jmp padding.
3) 2051~4098: The repeated "goto 1~16" instructions are designed to be
consumed by the nop jmp optimization. In the end, those
instrucitons become 128 continuous 0 offset jmp and are
optimized out in 1 pass, and this make insn 2050 an imm32
nop jmp in the next pass, so that we can trigger the
5 bytes padding.
4) 4099~4100: Those are the instructions to end the program.
The x64 jit code is like this:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 bc 7b d5 d3 call 0xffffffffd3d57bcc
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 7e 66 00 00 je 0x6698
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 74 66 00 00 je 0x6698
24: 48 83 f8 03 cmp rax,0x3
28: 0f 84 6a 66 00 00 je 0x6698
2e: 48 83 f8 04 cmp rax,0x4
32: 0f 84 60 66 00 00 je 0x6698
38: 48 83 f8 05 cmp rax,0x5
3c: 0f 84 56 66 00 00 je 0x6698
42: 48 83 f8 06 cmp rax,0x6
46: 0f 84 4c 66 00 00 je 0x6698
...
666c: 48 81 f8 fe 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7fe
6673: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6677: 74 1f je 0x6698
6679: 48 81 f8 ff 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7ff
6680: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6684: 74 12 je 0x6698
6686: 48 81 f8 00 08 00 00 cmp rax,0x800
668d: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6691: 74 05 je 0x6698
6693: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
6698: b8 02 00 00 00 mov eax,0x2
669d: c9 leave
669e: c3 ret
Since insn 2051~4098 are optimized out right before the padding pass,
there are several conditional jumps from the first part are replaced with
imm8 jmp_cond, and this triggers the 4 bytes padding, for example at
6673, 6680, and 668d. On the other hand, Insn 2050 is replaced with the
5 bytes nops at 6693.
The third test is to invoke the first and second tests as subprogs to test
bpf2bpf. Per the system log, there was one more jit happened with only
one pass and the same jit code was produced.
v4:
- Add the second test case which triggers jmp_cond padding and imm32 nop
jmp padding.
- Add the new test case as another subprog
Signed-off-by: Gary Lin <glin@xxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jit.c | 24 +++++++
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 777a81404fdb..e0e65ff30a2d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -296,6 +296,78 @@ static void bpf_fill_scale(struct bpf_test *self)
}
}
+static int bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_1(struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ unsigned int len = 259, hlen = 128;
+ int i;
+
+ insn[0] = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32);
+ for (i = 1; i <= hlen; i++) {
+ insn[i] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, i, hlen);
+ insn[i + hlen] = BPF_JMP_A(hlen - i);
+ }
+ insn[len - 2] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1);
+ insn[len - 1] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+static int bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_2(struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ unsigned int len = 4100, jmp_off = 2048;
+ int i, j;
+
+ insn[0] = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32);
+ for (i = 1; i <= jmp_off; i++) {
+ insn[i] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, i, jmp_off);
+ }
+ insn[i++] = BPF_JMP_A(jmp_off);
+ for (; i <= jmp_off * 2 + 1; i+=16) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 16; j++) {
+ insn[i + j] = BPF_JMP_A(16 - j - 1);
+ }
+ }
+
+ insn[len - 2] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2);
+ insn[len - 1] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+static void bpf_fill_torturous_jumps(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = self->fill_insns;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ switch (self->retval) {
+ case 1:
+ self->prog_len = bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_1(insn);
+ return;
+ case 2:
+ self->prog_len = bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_2(insn);
+ return;
+ case 3:
+ /* main */
+ insn[i++] = BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP|BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP|BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 262);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_10, -32, 0);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 3);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ /* subprog 1 */
+ i += bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_1(insn + i);
+
+ /* subprog 2 */
+ i += bpf_fill_torturous_jumps_insn_2(insn + i);
+
+ self->prog_len = i;
+ return;
+ default:
+ self->prog_len = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
/* BPF_SK_LOOKUP contains 13 instructions, if you need to fix up maps */
#define BPF_SK_LOOKUP(func) \
/* struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {} */ \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jit.c
index c33adf344fae..df215e004566 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jit.c
@@ -105,3 +105,27 @@
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
+{
+ "jit: torturous jumps, imm8 nop jmp and pure jump padding",
+ .insns = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_torturous_jumps,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+},
+{
+ "jit: torturous jumps, imm32 nop jmp and jmp_cond padding",
+ .insns = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_torturous_jumps,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 2,
+},
+{
+ "jit: torturous jumps in subprog",
+ .insns = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_torturous_jumps,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 3,
+},
--
2.29.2
