Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests: bpf: Add a new test for bare tracepoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/16/21 10:21 AM, Qais Yousef wrote:
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.

Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
---
  .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h      |  6 +++++
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 21 ++++++++++++++-
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  6 +++++
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c  | 10 +++++++
  5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
index b83ea448bc79..89c6d58e5dd6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_testmod_test_read,
  		  __entry->pid, __entry->comm, __entry->off, __entry->len)
  );
+/* A bare tracepoint with no event associated with it */
+DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_write_bare,
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx *ctx),
+	TP_ARGS(task, ctx)
+);
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */
#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 2df19d73ca49..e900adad2276 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -28,9 +28,28 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_read);
  ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
+noinline ssize_t
+bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
+		      struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
+		      char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
+{
+	struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
+		.buf = buf,
+		.off = off,
+		.len = len,
+	};
+
+	trace_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare(current, &ctx);
+
+	return -EIO; /* always fail */
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_write);
+ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_write, ERRNO);
+
  static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = {

Do we need to remove __ro_after_init?

-	.attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0444, },
+	.attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0666, },
  	.read = bpf_testmod_test_read,
+	.write = bpf_testmod_test_write,
  };
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index b81adfedb4f6..b3892dc40111 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -11,4 +11,10 @@ struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx {
  	size_t len;
  };
+struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx {
+	char *buf;
+	loff_t off;
+	size_t len;
+};
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
index 50796b651f72..e4605c0b5af1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
@@ -21,9 +21,34 @@ static int trigger_module_test_read(int read_sz)
  	return 0;
  }
+static int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz)
+{
+	int fd, err;

Init err = 0?

+	char *buf = malloc(write_sz);
+
+	if (!buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;

Looks like we already non-negative value, so return ENOMEM?

+
+	memset(buf, 'a', write_sz);
+	buf[write_sz-1] = '\0';
+
+	fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY);
+	err = -errno;
+	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto out;

Change the above to
	fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY);
	if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", errno)) {
		err = -errno;
		goto out;
	}

+
+	write(fd, buf, write_sz);
+	close(fd);
+out:
+	free(buf);
+

No need for extra line here.

+	return 0;

return err.

+}
+
  void test_module_attach(void)
  {
  	const int READ_SZ = 456;
+	const int WRITE_SZ = 457;
  	struct test_module_attach* skel;
  	struct test_module_attach__bss *bss;
  	int err;
@@ -48,8 +73,10 @@ void test_module_attach(void)
/* trigger tracepoint */
  	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(READ_SZ), "trigger_read");
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_write(WRITE_SZ), "trigger_write");
ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_read_sz, READ_SZ, "raw_tp");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_bare_write_sz, WRITE_SZ, "raw_tp_bare");
  	ASSERT_EQ(bss->tp_btf_read_sz, READ_SZ, "tp_btf");
  	ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry");
  	ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_manual_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry_manual");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
index efd1e287ac17..bd37ceec5587 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp,
  	return 0;
  }
+__u32 raw_tp_bare_write_sz = 0;
+
+SEC("raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_write_bare")
+int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_bare,
+	     struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx *write_ctx)
+{
+	raw_tp_bare_write_sz = BPF_CORE_READ(write_ctx, len);
+	return 0;
+}
+
  __u32 tp_btf_read_sz = 0;
SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read")




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux