Re: pull-request: bpf 2021-01-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:20:25 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> 1) Fix a double bpf_prog_put() for BPF_PROG_{TYPE_EXT,TYPE_TRACING} types in
>    link creation's error path causing a refcount underflow, from Jiri Olsa.
> 
> 2) Fix BTF validation errors for the case where kernel modules don't declare
>    any new types and end up with an empty BTF, from Andrii Nakryiko.
> 
> 3) Fix BPF local storage helpers to first check their {task,inode} owners for
>    being NULL before access, from KP Singh.
> 
> 4) Fix a memory leak in BPF setsockopt handling for the case where optlen is
>    zero and thus temporary optval buffer should be freed, from Stanislav Fomichev.
> 
> 5) Fix a syzbot memory allocation splat in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN infra for
>    raw_tracepoint caused by too big ctx_size_in, from Song Liu.
> 
> 6) Fix LLVM code generation issues with verifier where PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL}
>    registers were spilled to stack but not recognized, from Gilad Reti.

I forgot the bot doesn't reply to bpf PRs.

Pulled, thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux