Re: [RPC PATCH bpf-next] bpf: implement new BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_POST_CONNECT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:51 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >         lock_sock(sock->sk);
> > >         err = __inet_stream_connect(sock, uaddr, addr_len, flags, 0);
> >
> > Similarly here, attaching fexit to __inet_stream_connect would execute
> > your BPF program at exactly the same time (and then you can check for
> > err value).
> >
> > Or the point here is to have a more "stable" BPF program type?
> Good suggestion, I can try to play with it, I think it should give me
> all the info I need (I only need sock).
> But yeah, I'd rather prefer a stable interface against stable
> __sk_buff, but maybe fexit will also work.

Maybe we can add an extension to fentry/fexit that are cgroup scoped?
I think this will solve many such cases.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux