Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/3] bpf: remove extra lock_sock for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:27 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:33 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add custom implementation of getsockopt hook for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE.
> > We skip generic hooks for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE and have a custom
> > call in do_tcp_getsockopt using the on-stack data. This removes
> > 3% overhead for locking/unlocking the socket.
> >
> > Without this patch:
> >      3.38%     0.07%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
> >             |
> >              --3.30%--__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
> >                        |
> >                         --0.81%--__kmalloc
> >
> > With the patch applied:
> >      0.52%     0.12%  tcp_mmap  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
>
> Few issues in this patch and the patch 2 doesn't apply:
> Switched to a new branch 'tmp'
> Applying: bpf: Remove extra lock_sock for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:295: trailing whitespace.
> #endif
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:306: trailing whitespace.
> union tcp_word_hdr {
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:309: trailing whitespace.
> };
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:311: trailing whitespace.
> #define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))->words [3])
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:313: trailing whitespace.
> enum {
> warning: squelched 1 whitespace error
> warning: 6 lines add whitespace errors.
> Applying: bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc in cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt
> error: patch failed: kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1390
> error: kernel/bpf/cgroup.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0002 bpf: Try to avoid kzalloc in cgroup/{s,g}etsockopt
Sorry, I mentioned in the cover letter that the series requires
4be34f3d0731 ("bpf: Don't leak memory in bpf getsockopt when optlen == 0")
which is only in the bpf tree. No sure when bpf & bpf-next merge.
Or are you trying to apply on top of that?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux