Sorry for misunderstanding, I'll resend _all_ the patches to all the maintainers and copy existing comments for further discussion On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:21 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:12 AM Yuri Benditovich > <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Existing TUN module is able to use provided "steering eBPF" to > > calculate per-packet hash and derive the destination queue to > > place the packet to. The eBPF uses mapped configuration data > > containing a key for hash calculation and indirection table > > with array of queues' indices. > > > > This series of patches adds support for virtio-net hash reporting > > feature as defined in virtio specification. It extends the TUN module > > and the "steering eBPF" as follows: > > > > Extended steering eBPF calculates the hash value and hash type, keeps > > hash value in the skb->hash and returns index of destination virtqueue > > and the type of the hash. TUN module keeps returned hash type in > > (currently unused) field of the skb. > > skb->__unused renamed to 'hash_report_type'. > > > > When TUN module is called later to allocate and fill the virtio-net > > header and push it to destination virtqueue it populates the hash > > and the hash type into virtio-net header. > > > > VHOST driver is made aware of respective virtio-net feature that > > extends the virtio-net header to report the hash value and hash report > > type. > > > > Yuri Benditovich (7): > > skbuff: define field for hash report type > > vhost: support for hash report virtio-net feature > > tun: allow use of BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS program type > > tun: free bpf_program by bpf_prog_put instead of bpf_prog_destroy > > tun: add ioctl code TUNSETHASHPOPULATION > > tun: populate hash in virtio-net header when needed > > tun: report new tun feature IFF_HASH > > Patch 1/7 is missing. > > Skbuff fields are in short supply. I don't think we need to add one > just for this narrow path entirely internal to the tun device. > > Instead, you could just run the flow_dissector in tun_put_user if the > feature is negotiated. Indeed, the flow dissector seems more apt to me > than BPF here. Note that the flow dissector internally can be > overridden by a BPF program if the admin so chooses. > > This also hits on a deeper point with the choice of hash values, that > I also noticed in my RFC patchset to implement the inverse [1][2]. It > is much more detailed than skb->hash + skb->l4_hash currently offers, > and that can be gotten for free from most hardware. In most practical > cases, that information suffices. I added less specific fields > VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_L4, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_OTHER that work > without explicit flow dissection. I understand that the existing > fields are part of the standard. Just curious, what is their purpose > beyond 4-tuple based flow hashing? > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=406859&state=* > [2] https://github.com/wdebruij/linux/commit/0f77febf22cd6ffc242a575807fa8382a26e511e
