Re: Check pahole availibity and BPF support of toolchain before starting a Linux kernel build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:05 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/11/21 4:48 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Hi BPF maintainers and Mashiro,
> >
> > Debian started to use CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y.
> >
> > My kernel-build fails like this:
> >
> > + info BTFIDS vmlinux
> > + [  != silent_ ]
> > + printf   %-7s %s\n BTFIDS vmlinux
> >   BTFIDS  vmlinux
> > + ./tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids vmlinux
> > FAILED: load BTF from vmlinux: Invalid argument
> >
> > The root cause is my selfmade LLVM toolchain has no BPF support.
>
> linux build should depend on LLVM toolchain unless you use LLVM to build
> kernel.
>
> >
> > $ which llc
> > /home/dileks/src/llvm-toolchain/install/bin/llc
> >
> > $ llc --version
> > LLVM (http://llvm.org/ ):
> >   LLVM version 11.0.1
> >   Optimized build.
> >   Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >   Host CPU: sandybridge
> >
> >   Registered Targets:
> >     x86    - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above
> >     x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64
> >
> > Debian's llc-11 shows me BPF support is built-in.
> >
> > I see the breakag approx. 3 hours after the start of my kernel-build -
> > in the stage "vmlinux".
> > After 2 faulures in my build (2x 3 hours of build-time) I have still
> > no finished Linux v5.11-rc3 kernel.
> > This is a bit frustrating.
>
> You mean "BTFIDS  vmlinux" takes more than 3 hours here?
> Maybe a bug in resolve_btfids due to somehow different ELF format
> resolve_btfids need to handle?
>

[ CC Tom ]

OMG no.

3 hours up to running scripts/link-vmlinux.sh.

In the meantime I have built a LLVM toolchain with BPF support.

$ llc --version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
 LLVM version 11.0.1
 Optimized build.
 Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
 Host CPU: sandybridge

 Registered Targets:
   bpf    - BPF (host endian)
   bpfeb  - BPF (big endian)
   bpfel  - BPF (little endian)
   x86    - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above
   x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64

Tom reported BTF issues with pahole v1.19 (see [2] and [3]):
"I ran into this same bug trying to build the Fedora kernel. The
problem is that pahole segfaults at: scripts/link-vmlinux.sh:131. This
looks to me like a bug in pahole."

pahole ToT (post v1.19) offers some BTF fixes - I have manually build
and use it.

Building a new Linux-kernel...

- Sedat -

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/
[2] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/tc-build/issues/129#issuecomment-758026878
[3] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/tc-build/issues/129#issuecomment-758056553



> >
> > What about doing pre-checks - means before doing a single line of
> > compilation - to check for:
> > 1. Required binaries
> > 2. Required support of whatever feature in compiler, linker, toolchain etc.
> >
> > Recently, I fell over depmod binary not found in my PATH - in one of
> > the last steps (modfinal) of the kernel build.
> >
> > Any ideas to improve the situation?
> > ( ...and please no RTFM, see links below. )
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > - Sedat -
> >
> >
> > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh#n144
> > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/929891281c61ce4403ddd869664c949692644a2f
> > [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.html?highlight=pahole#llvm
> > [3] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/btf.html?highlight=pahole#btf-generation
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux