Re: [Patch bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce timeout map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:28 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
> Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
> map, patch 3 contains a test case for timeout map. Please check each
> patch description for more details.
>
> ---

This patch set seems to be breaking existing selftests. Please take a
look ([0]).
Also patch #3 should have a commit message, even if pretty trivial one.

  [0] https://travis-ci.com/github/kernel-patches/bpf/builds/207928289

> Cong Wang (3):
>   bpf: use index instead of hash for map_locked[]
>   bpf: introduce timeout map
>   tools: add a test case for bpf timeout map
>
>  include/linux/bpf_types.h               |   1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   3 +-
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                    | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c                    |   3 +-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h          |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c |  41 ++++
>  6 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux