Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Fixes for ima selftest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:44 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:58 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > # v2 -> v3
> >
> > * Added missing tags.
> > * Indentation fixes + some other fixes suggested by Andrii.
> > * Re-indent file to tabs.
> >
> > # What?
> >
> > * Fixes to work in busybox shell (tested on the one used by BPF CI).
> > * Ensure that securityfs is mounted before updating the ima policy
> > * Add missing config deps.
> >
>
> KP, please take a look at other cover letters to get a better idea of
> how they usually look like. It has to be a human-readable overview of
> why the patch set was posted and what problem it is solving. List of
> action items without any context is not the best format.

Sure, I thought the individual commit messages were sufficient context
but I can add a better one here.

>
> >
> > KP Singh (4):
> >   selftests/bpf: Update ima_setup.sh for busybox
> >   selftests/bpf: Ensure securityfs mount before writing ima policy
> >   selftests/bpf: Add config dependency on BLK_DEV_LOOP
> >   selftests/bpf: Indent ima_setup.sh with tabs.
> >
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config       |   1 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh | 107 +++++++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux