Re: [Patch net] lwt: disable BH too in run_lwt_bpf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue,  1 Dec 2020 11:44:38 -0800 Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The per-cpu bpf_redirect_info is shared among all skb_do_redirect()
> and BPF redirect helpers. Callers on RX path are all in BH context,
> disabling preemption is not sufficient to prevent BH interruption.
> 
> In production, we observed strange packet drops because of the race
> condition between LWT xmit and TC ingress, and we verified this issue
> is fixed after we disable BH.
> 
> Although this bug was technically introduced from the beginning, that
> is commit 3a0af8fd61f9 ("bpf: BPF for lightweight tunnel infrastructure"),
> at that time call_rcu() had to be call_rcu_bh() to match the RCU context.
> So this patch may not work well before RCU flavor consolidation has been
> completed around v5.0.
> 
> Update the comments above the code too, as call_rcu() is now BH friendly.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> index 7d3438215f32..4f3cb7c15ddf 100644
> --- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
> @@ -39,12 +39,11 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/* Preempt disable is needed to protect per-cpu redirect_info between
> -	 * BPF prog and skb_do_redirect(). The call_rcu in bpf_prog_put() and
> -	 * access to maps strictly require a rcu_read_lock() for protection,
> -	 * mixing with BH RCU lock doesn't work.
> +	/* Preempt disable and BH disable are needed to protect per-cpu
> +	 * redirect_info between BPF prog and skb_do_redirect().
>  	 */
>  	preempt_disable();
> +	local_bh_disable();

Why not remove the preempt_disable()? Disabling BH must also disable
preemption AFAIK.

>  	bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
>  	ret = bpf_prog_run_save_cb(lwt->prog, skb);
>  
> @@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	local_bh_enable();
>  	preempt_enable();
>  
>  	return ret;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux