On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:15:52PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 05:57:26PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > > +/* Emit the ModR/M byte for addressing *(r1 + off) and r2 */ > > +static void emit_modrm_dstoff(u8 **pprog, u32 r1, u32 r2, int off) > > same concern as in the another patch. If you could avoid intel's puzzling names > like above it will make reviewing the patch easier. In this case there is actually a call like emit_modrm_dstoff(&prog, src_reg, dst_reg) So calling the function args dst_reg, src_reg would be misleading. I could call them ptr_reg and val_reg or something?
