Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:54:20 -0800
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>, "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx>, maximmi@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJ+HfNh4Kybjuzi1KOvJBUBvQWFDCZgt7zZNU=ZS8FLCsNKiRQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:31:14 +0100 Björn Töpel wrote:
> Eric/Jakub, any more thoughts/input? Tomatoes? :-P

Looking now, sorry for the delay. Somehow patches without net in their
tag feel like they can wait..

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling
  - From: Björn Töpel
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling
  - From: Björn Töpel

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] Introduce preferred busy-polling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux