On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:06 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:22:42PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > [ ... ] > > > +static int load_module_btfs(struct bpf_object *obj) > > +{ > > + struct bpf_btf_info info; > > + struct module_btf *mod_btf; > > + struct btf *btf; > > + char name[64]; > > + __u32 id, len; > > + int err, fd; > > + > > + if (obj->btf_modules_loaded) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* don't do this again, even if we find no module BTFs */ > > + obj->btf_modules_loaded = true; > > + > > + /* kernel too old to support module BTFs */ > > + if (!kernel_supports(FEAT_MODULE_BTF)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + while (true) { > > + err = bpf_btf_get_next_id(id, &id); > > + if (err && errno == ENOENT) > > + return 0; > > + if (err) { > > + err = -errno; > > + pr_warn("failed to iterate BTF objects: %d\n", err); > > + return err; > > + } > > + > > + fd = bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(id); > > + if (fd < 0) { > > + if (errno == ENOENT) > > + continue; /* expected race: BTF was unloaded */ > > + err = -errno; > > + pr_warn("failed to get BTF object #%d FD: %d\n", id, err); > > + return err; > > + } > > + > > + len = sizeof(info); > > + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); > > + info.name = ptr_to_u64(name); > > + info.name_len = sizeof(name); > > + > > + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len); > > + if (err) { > > + err = -errno; > > + pr_warn("failed to get BTF object #%d info: %d\n", id, err); > > close(fd); > > > + return err; > > + } > > + > > + /* ignore non-module BTFs */ > > + if (!info.kernel_btf || strcmp(name, "vmlinux") == 0) { > > + close(fd); > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > [ ... ] > > > @@ -8656,9 +8815,6 @@ static inline int __find_vmlinux_btf_id(struct btf *btf, const char *name, > > else > > err = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC); > > > > - if (err <= 0) > > - pr_warn("%s is not found in vmlinux BTF\n", name); > > - > > return err; > > } > > > > @@ -8675,6 +8831,9 @@ int libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id(const char *name, > > } > > > > err = __find_vmlinux_btf_id(btf, name, attach_type); > > + if (err <= 0) > > + pr_warn("%s is not found in vmlinux BTF\n", name); > > + > Please explain this move in the commit message. ok, I'll add something about that. The short answer is that __find_vmlinux_btf_id() is now expected to not find a type in vmlinux BTF, so emitting error would be wrong. So I moved it up a level where it's not expected. > > > btf__free(btf); > > return err; > > } > > -- > > 2.24.1 > >