Re: [PATCH net-next] MAINTAINERS: Update XDP and AF_XDP entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:02:10 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:26:40 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Getting too many false positive matches with current use
> > of the content regex K: and file regex N: patterns.
> > 
> > This patch drops file match N: and makes K: more restricted.
> > Some more normal F: file wildcards are added.
> > 
> > Notice that AF_XDP forgot to some F: files that is also
> > updated in this patch.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>  
> 
> Ah! Sorry, I missed that you sent this before replying to Joe.
> 
> Would you mind respining with his regex?

Sure, I just send it... with your adjusted '(\b|_)xdp(\b|_)' regex, as
it seems to do the same thing (and it works with egrep).

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux