Re: XDP maintainer match (Was [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:35 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think it is a good idea to change the keyword (K:), but I'm not sure
> this catch what we want, maybe it does.  The pattern match are meant to
> catch drivers containing XDP related bits.
> 
> Previously Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> suggested this pattern match,
> which I don't fully understand... could you explain Joe?
> 
>   (?:\b|_)xdp(?:\b|_)

This regex matches only:

	xdp
	xdp_<anything>
	<anything>_xdp_<anything>
	<anything>_xdp

> For the filename (N:) regex match, I'm considering if we should remove
> it and list more files explicitly.  I think normal glob * pattern
> works, which should be sufficient.

Lists are generally more specific than regex globs.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux