Re: violating function pointer signature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: violating function pointer signature
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:59:01 -0500
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@xxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>, Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-toolchains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201118135823.3f0d24b7@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:58:23 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  an not worry about gcc 

or LLVM, or whatever is used to build the kernel.

-- Steve

References:
- [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers
- Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers
- Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- violating function pointer signature
  - From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: violating function pointer signature
  - From: Nick Desaulniers
- Re: violating function pointer signature
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: violating function pointer signature
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: violating function pointer signature
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: violating function pointer signature
  - From: Steven Rostedt

Prev by Date: Re: violating function pointer signature
Next by Date: Re: violating function pointer signature
Previous by thread: Re: violating function pointer signature
Next by thread: Re: violating function pointer signature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]