Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] samples: bpf: refactor test_cgrp2_sock2 program with libbpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:02 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 6:57 AM Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This commit refactors the existing cgroup program with libbpf bpf
> > loader. The original test_cgrp2_sock2 has keeped the bpf program
> > attached to the cgroup hierarchy even after the exit of user program.
> > To implement the same functionality with libbpf, this commit uses the
> > BPF_LINK_PINNING to pin the link attachment even after it is closed.
> >
> > Since this uses LINK instead of ATTACH, detach of bpf program from
> > cgroup with 'test_cgrp2_sock' is not used anymore.
> >
> > The code to mount the bpf was added to the .sh file in case the bpff
> > was not mounted on /sys/fs/bpf. Additionally, to fix the problem that
> > shell script cannot find the binary object from the current path,
> > relative path './' has been added in front of binary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  samples/bpf/Makefile            |  2 +-
> >  samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock2.c  | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  samples/bpf/test_cgrp2_sock2.sh | 21 ++++++++---
> >  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > -       return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > +       err = bpf_link__pin(link, link_pin_path);
> > +       if (err < 0) {
> > +               printf("err : %d\n", err);
>
> more meaningful error message would be helpful
>

Thanks for pointing out, I will fix it directly!

> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > +
> > +cleanup:
> > +       if (ret != EXIT_SUCCESS)
> > +               bpf_link__destroy(link);
> > +
> > +       bpf_object__close(obj);
> > +       return ret;
> >  }
>
> [...]
>
> >
> >  function attach_bpf {
> > -       test_cgrp2_sock2 /tmp/cgroupv2/foo sock_flags_kern.o $1
> > +       ./test_cgrp2_sock2 /tmp/cgroupv2/foo sock_flags_kern.o $1
>
> Can you please add Fixes: tag for this?
>

Will add it in the next version of patch :)

Thanks for your time and effort for the review.

-- 
Best,
Daniel T. Lee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux