On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:22:23 -0500 (EST)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If we don't call the stub, then there is no point in having the stub at
> all, and we should just compare to a constant value, e.g. 0x1UL. As far
> as I can recall, comparing with a small immediate constant is more efficient
> than comparing with a loaded value on many architectures.
Why 0x1UL, and not just set it to NULL.
do { \
it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \
__data = (it_func_ptr)->data; \
if (likely(it_func)) \
((void(*)(void *, proto))(it_func))(__data, args); \
} while ((++it_func_ptr)->func);
-- Steve
