On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:14:48AM -0800, Song Liu wrote: > > > > On Nov 12, 2020, at 2:15 PM, Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps. > > It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 11 ----------- > > 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c > > index fd4f9ac1d042..3b0da5a04d55 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c > > Do we need to change/remove mem_charge() and mem_uncharge() in > bpf_local_storage.c? I didn't find that in the set. No, those are used for per-socket memory limits (see sk_storage_charge() and omem_charge()). Btw, thanks for looking into the patchset!
