On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 13:57 -0800, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > Test(s) is needed. e.g. iterating a bpf_sk_storage_map and also > calling bpf_sk_storage_get/delete. > > I would expect to see another test/example showing how it works end- > to-end to solve the problem you have in hand. > This patch probably belongs to a longer series. Fair point, I'll get that done, thank you! > BTW, I am also enabling bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete) for > FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP but I think the conflict should be manageable. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201112211313.2587383-1-kafai@xxxxxx/ Thanks for the heads up, should be no problem :)
