On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:20 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sleepable hooks are never called from an NMI/interrupt context, so it is
> safe to use the bpf_d_path helper in LSM programs attaching to these
> hooks.
>
> The helper is not restricted to sleepable programs and merely uses the
> list of sleeable hooks as the initial subset of LSM hooks where it can
> be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
LGTM.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index e4515b0f62a8..eab1af02c90d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> #include <linux/error-injection.h>
> #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
>
> #include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/btf.h>
> @@ -1178,7 +1179,11 @@ BTF_SET_END(btf_allowlist_d_path)
>
> static bool bpf_d_path_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> - return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path, prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
> + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM)
> + return bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
> +
> + return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path,
> + prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
> }
>
> BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_d_path_btf_ids, struct, path)
> --
> 2.29.2.222.g5d2a92d10f8-goog
>
