On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:37 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:24 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/11/20 2:54 PM, Wang Hai wrote:
> > > progfd is created by prog_parse_fd(), before 'bpftool net attach' exit,
> > > it should be closed.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 04949ccc273e ("tools: bpftool: add net attach command to attach XDP on interface")
> > > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2->v3: add 'err = 0' before successful return
> > > v1->v2: use cleanup tag instead of repeated closes
> > > tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > > index 910e7bac6e9e..f927392271cc 100644
> > > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > > @@ -578,8 +578,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > >
> > > ifindex = net_parse_dev(&argc, &argv);
> > > if (ifindex < 1) {
> > > - close(progfd);
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (argc) {
> > > @@ -587,8 +587,8 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > > overwrite = true;
> > > } else {
> > > p_err("expected 'overwrite', got: '%s'?", *argv);
> > > - close(progfd);
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -597,16 +597,20 @@ static int do_attach(int argc, char **argv)
> > > err = do_attach_detach_xdp(progfd, attach_type, ifindex,
> > > overwrite);
> > >
> > > - if (err < 0) {
> > > + if (err) {
> > > p_err("interface %s attach failed: %s",
> > > attach_type_strings[attach_type], strerror(-err));
> > > - return err;
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (json_output)
> > > jsonw_null(json_wtr);
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + err = 0;
> >
> > Why is the 'err = 0' still needed here given we test for err != 0 earlier?
> > Would just remove it, otherwise looks good.
>
> This patch was already applied. Wang, can you please follow up with
> another patch to address Daniel's feedback?
Actually, the patch hasn't been applied yet, so please just respin, thanks.
>
> >
> > > +cleanup:
> > > + close(progfd);
> > > + return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int do_detach(int argc, char **argv)
> > >
> >
