On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 7:47 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:31:31PM +0100, KP Singh wrote:
> > +
> > +struct storage {
> > + void *inode;
> > + unsigned int value;
> > + /* Lock ensures that spin locked versions of local stoage operations
> > + * also work, most operations in this tests are still single threaded
> > + */
> > + struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
> > +};
>
> I think it's a good idea to test spin_lock in local_storage,
> but it seems the test is not doing it fully.
> It's only adding it to the storage, but the program is not accessing it.
I added it here just to check if the offset calculations (map->spin_lock_off)
are correctly happening for these new maps.
As mentioned in the updates, I do intend to generalize
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/sk_storage_map.c which already has
the threading logic to exercise bpf_spin_lock in storage maps.
Hope this is an okay plan?
