On 11/2/20 2:28 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>> index e6ceac3f7d62..01b2b17c645a 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>>> @@ -2219,6 +2219,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
>>> * * > 0 one of **BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_** codes explaining why the
>>> * packet is not forwarded or needs assist from full stack
>>> *
>>> + * If lookup fails with BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED, then the MTU
>>> + * was exceeded and result params->mtu contains the MTU.
>>> + *
>>
>> Do we need to hide this behind a flag? It seems otherwise you might confuse
>> users. I imagine on error we could reuse the params arg, but now we changed
>> the tot_len value underneath them?
>
> The principle behind this bpf_fib_lookup helper, is that params (struct
> bpf_fib_lookup) is used for both input and output (results). Almost
> every field is change after the lookup. (For performance reasons this
> is kept at 64 bytes (cache-line)) Thus, users of this helper already
> expect/knows the contents of params have changed.
>
yes, that was done on purpose.
Jesper: you should remove the '(if requested check_mtu)' comment in the
documentation. That is an internal flag only -- xdp is true, tc is false.
