Jakub suggested in [1] a "strict busy-polling mode with out interrupts". This is a first stab at that. This series adds a new NAPI mode, called biased busy-polling, which is an extension to the existing busy-polling mode. The new mode is enabled on the socket layer, where a socket setting this option "promisies" to busy-poll the NAPI context via a system call. When this mode is enabled, the NAPI context will operate in a mode with interrupts disabled. The kernel monitors that the busy-polling promise is fulfilled by an internal watchdog. If the socket fail/stop performing the busy-polling, the mode will be disabled. Biased busy-polling follows the same mechanism as the existing busy-poll; The napi_id is reported to the socket via the skbuff. Later commits will extend napi_id reporting to XDP, in order to work correctly with XDP sockets. Let us walk through a flow of execution: 1. A socket sets the new SO_BIAS_BUSY_POLL socket option to true. The socket now shows an intent of doing busy-polling. No data has been received to the socket, so the napi_id of the socket is still 0 (non-valid). As usual for busy-polling, the SO_BUSY_POLL option also has to be non-zero for biased busy-polling. 2. Data is received on the socket changing the napi_id to non-zero. 3. The socket does a system call that has the busy-polling logic wired up, e.g. recvfrom() for UDP sockets. The NAPI context is now marked as biased busy-poll. The kernel watchdog is armed. If the NAPI context is already running, it will try to finish as soon as possible and move to busy-polling. If the NAPI context is not running, it will execute the NAPI poll function for the corresponding napi_id. 4. Goto 3, or wait until the watchdog timeout. The series is outlined as following: Patch 1-2: Biased busy-polling, and option to set busy-poll budget. Patch 3-6: Busy-poll plumbing for XDP sockets Patch 7-9: Add busy-polling support to the xdpsock sample Performance UDP sockets: I hacked netperf to use non-blocking sockets, and looping over recvfrom(). The following command-line was used: $ netperf -H 192.168.1.1 -l 30 -t UDP_RR -v 2 -- \ -o min_latency,mean_latency,max_latency,stddev_latency,transaction_rate Non-blocking: 16,18.45,195,0.94,54070.369 Non-blocking with biased busy-polling: 15,16.59,38,0.70,60086.313 Performance XDP sockets: Today, running XDP sockets sample on the same core as the softirq handling, performance tanks mainly because we do not yield to user-space when the XDP socket Rx queue is full. # taskset -c 5 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 5 -n 1 -r Rx: 64Kpps # # biased busy-polling, budget 8 # taskset -c 5 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 5 -n 1 -r -B -b 8 Rx 9.9Mpps # # biased busy-polling, budget 64 # taskset -c 5 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 5 -n 1 -r -B -b 64 Rx: 19.3Mpps # # biased busy-polling, budget 256 # taskset -c 5 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 5 -n 1 -r -B -b 256 Rx: 21.4Mpps # # biased busy-polling, budget 512 # taskset -c 5 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 5 -n 1 -r -B -b 512 Rx: 21.4Mpps Compared to the two-core case: # taskset -c 4 ./xdpsock -i ens785f1 -q 20 -n 1 -r Rx: 20.7Mpps We're getting better single-core performance than two, for this naïve drop scenario. The above tests was done for the 'ice' driver. Some outstanding questions: * Does biased busy-polling make sense for non-XDP sockets? For a dedicated queue, biased busy-polling has a strong case. When the NAPI is shared with other sockets, it can affect the latencies of sockets that were not explicity busy-poll enabled. Note that this true for regular busy-polling as well, but the biased version is stricter. * Currently busy-polling for UDP/TCP is only wired up in the recvmsg() path. Does it make sense to extend that to sendmsg() as well? * Biased busy-polling only makes sense for non-blocking sockets. Reject enabling of biased busy-polling unless the socket is non-blocking? * The watchdog is 200 ms. Should it be configurable? * Extending xdp_rxq_info_reg() with napi_id touches a lot of drivers, and I've only verified the Intel ones. Some drivers initialize NAPI (generating the napi_id) after the xdp_rxq_info_reg() call, which maybe would open up for another API? I did not send this RFC to all the driver authors. I'll do that for a patch proper series. * Today, enabling busy-polling require CAP_NET_ADMIN. For a NAPI context that services multiple socket, this makes sense because one socket can affect performance of other sockets. Now, for a *dedicated* queue for say XDP socket, would it be OK to drop CAP_NET_ADMIN, because it cannot affect other sockets/users? @Jakub Thanks for the early comments. I left the check in napi_schedule_prep(), because I hit that for the Intel i40e driver; forcing busy-polling on a core outside the interrupt affinity mask. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200925120652.10b8d7c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Björn Töpel (9): net: introduce biased busy-polling net: add SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET socket option xsk: add support for recvmsg() xsk: check need wakeup flag in sendmsg() xsk: add busy-poll support for {recv,send}msg() xsk: propagate napi_id to XDP socket Rx path samples/bpf: use recvfrom() in xdpsock samples/bpf: add busy-poll support to xdpsock samples/bpf: add option to set the busy-poll budget arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 3 + arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 3 + arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 3 + arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 3 + drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 +- .../ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_queues.c | 2 +- .../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 +- .../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 2 +- .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c | 2 +- drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 2 +- drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- drivers/net/veth.c | 2 +- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +- drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 2 +- fs/eventpoll.c | 3 +- include/linux/netdevice.h | 33 +++--- include/net/busy_poll.h | 42 +++++-- include/net/sock.h | 4 + include/net/xdp.h | 3 +- include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h | 3 + net/core/dev.c | 111 +++++++++++++++--- net/core/sock.c | 19 +++ net/core/xdp.c | 3 +- net/xdp/xsk.c | 36 +++++- net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 13 +- samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 53 +++++++-- 37 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) base-commit: 3cb12d27ff655e57e8efe3486dca2a22f4e30578 -- 2.27.0